<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon cuts negative reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darkcoding.net/society/amazon-cuts-negative-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darkcoding.net/society/amazon-cuts-negative-reviews/</link>
	<description>Solvitas perambulum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:12:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomalak Geret'kal</title>
		<link>http://www.darkcoding.net/society/amazon-cuts-negative-reviews/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomalak Geret'kal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkcoding.net/society/amazon-cuts-negative-reviews/#comment-830</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The article you link to is interesting enough, and I have no doubt that such censorship does go on on the internet -- Amazon in particular -- but whilst reading Brian&#039;s story I couldn&#039;t help but feel that he was, indeed, missing the point of a book review somewhat. Which is a shame because in theory I would be on his side. But I just didn&#039;t get the impression that he really understood what the reasons were behind the removal of his reviews.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article you link to is interesting enough, and I have no doubt that such censorship does go on on the internet &#8212; Amazon in particular &#8212; but whilst reading Brian&#8217;s story I couldn&#8217;t help but feel that he was, indeed, missing the point of a book review somewhat. Which is a shame because in theory I would be on his side. But I just didn&#8217;t get the impression that he really understood what the reasons were behind the removal of his reviews.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

